-[T]he people and government of Japan are extraordinarily well-prepared, as well as competent and well-resourced, and do not need significant external assistance in order to mount a maximally effective relief and recovery effort.
-Therefore, you as a donor do not have the power to improve the relief and recovery effort in Japan. …
-Aid being offered far exceeds aid being requested. …
-Charities are aggressively soliciting donations, often in ways we feel are misleading. …
Overall, though, a gift to Doctors Without Borders seems to us like the best way to effectively “respond to this disaster”. We feel they are a leader in transparency, honesty and integrity in relief organizations, and the fact that they’re not soliciting funds for Japan is a testament to this. Rewarding Doctors Without Borders is a move toward improving incentives and improving disaster relief in general.
Actually, this is my response to most news, but there’s an added layer of moral ickiness to this story with the whole laughing at someone who probably needs help.
“According to Richman, it was just now hitting him how many hours of his life he’s pissed away listening intently to nonsense about celebrity couples, how good or bad certain pens are, and why a particular sports team might have a chance this year.”